For many months one of the mathematics professors has been
trying to find statistics on the numbers of community college students
diagnosed as needing math remediation actually finished the recommended courses. He came to me for help. I searched the academic databases,
Statistical Abstracts of the United States[1], and
the U.S. Department of Education web site (http://www.ed.gov/)
without finding any help for the professor.
This
was a fuzzy search because we didn’t know the author, title, subject or even
the best key words to search. I tried
searching terms such as “community college developmental math” and got more
than 10,000 hits. None of which were
helpful. Limiting the search to academic
journals gave 3 hits, but none were even close to what was needed. After many searches spread out over four
days, I gave up; I had no more ideas.
The professor turned to his colleagues and one gave him a list of three
articles that I was able to find for the professor.[2]
How does one find something when they are not sure of what
they are looking for? Our information
seeking training does not offer great guidance. There is an express, “you can’t
nail jelly to a tree” used for problems that are impossible solve. What is interesting is source for this
expression is Theodore Roosevelt, but many people think it is a myth.
May 23, 1912
Theodore Roosevelt had a long campaign day in Northern New Jersey. At about 10:30
pm he got up to the podium at Dickenson
High School in Jersey
City, New Jersey to give a 30
minute speech. He is a transcription of
part of that speech.
When I became President I found
the negotiations for the proceeding with great decorum as they had proceeded
for years The Spaniards had discovered the Isthmus four and they had at once
said that it would be very nice to have across it and there had been four
centuries of conversation and I thought it was just as well that the
conversation into action I did my level best to get Colombia to agreement. We
were more than just we were more than generous Colombia.
Finally I had lo make up my mind that to hold up Uncle Sam. I didn’t intend
that Uncle Sam up and Colombia
intended to blackmail a French company then have had France
on the Isthmus. I was finally forced that to endeavor to negotiate with
Colombia was about to nail currant jelly to the wall. You can t do it.
It isn’t of the nail it's the fault of the jelly. [3]
I found this speech using several kinds of Google searches
until I found a book that Google had digitized.
The academic databases yielded no results.
The problem with Roosevelt was that
he was using conventional logic when he coined the expression. Computer programmers and librarians know how
to find solutions using unconventional searches and fuzzy logic. There are solutions to this problem. One
could freeze the jelly, one could put the jelly in a container and nail the
container to the tree, or one could hammer a big nail into the tree and spread
the jelly it. Several people have said
that “nailing jelly to a tree,” was one of Roosevelt’s
favorite expressions, but I can’t verify this.
How does one do fuzzy searches? If you went to a store and didn’t know
exactly what you needed, you could search the aisles in hopes that the product
you need would be obvious. Many times I
don’t know the name of what I want; I just know what it is supposed to do. One could go the grocery wanting food for
dinner, but not know what to buy. This
is a retailer’s dream because the merchandizing display, special deals, and
layout are all there to convince the consumer to buy something they had no idea
they needed before entering the store.
The world of information seeking is a bit harder; there are
no stores merchandizing information. There are no special information “sales.” One
could browse the library shelves in search of a book and hopefully find
something appropriate, but this process may be a matter of serendipity or blind
luck. One could read journals or other
periodicals and hopefully remember
enough to find the article the next time you needed something similar, but few
people have that kind of memory.
Unfortunately I have no great answers on how to find what you need with
a fuzzy search. One consults with an
expert and gets guidance toward the correct path. Librarians, subject specialists and
colleagues are good sources for this type of guidance, but this kind of search
depends on if you can find the expert and the time you need him or her.
From the cataloger perspective I have wondered how the
catalog record can be made friendlier to fuzzy search logic. If the title is not very indicative of the
subject and the subject headings are not what a searcher would guess, the
search is hard. We sometimes add tables
of contents that are searchable with keyword searching, but this has its limits
because the authors and/or publishers create these chapter titles.
Sorry, I have no answers that will work all the time. Fuzzy logic and successful fuzzy searching
depend on prior knowledge and wisdom that only comes with experience or access
to those with the experience you seek.
[1]
I looked in the print version of The Statistical Abstract of the United
States first to get an idea of what was available then went to the U.S.
Census Bureau web site that has the most current information. http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/
[2]
One of the articles is from Community
College Research
Center, Teachers College, Columbia
University. “Referral, Enrollment, and Completion in
Developmental Sequences in Community Colleges” by Thomas Bailey, Dong Wook
Jeong, Sung-Woo Cho was right on topic.
The prepublication paper may be downloaded from: http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/presentation/referral-enrollment-completion-3.html
The findings were presented on October
14, 2010.
The author supplied keywords are: Developmental
education, Community college.
Searching on these keywords would give too many hits to be useful for
the kind of information the math professor wanted.
[3] This is quoted in the book: Theodore Roosevelt : one day of his life
: reconstructed from contemporaneous accounts of his political campaign of 1912
… / by William H Richardson. Jersey City : Jersey City Printing Company, 1921 page 34.
1 comment:
Interesting post, thanks. I think this is a bit like the concept of heuristic searching: (I see this is defined on Wikipedia as "a technique for solving a problem when classic methods are too slow" - [yes, I love Wikipedia even though, or perhaps because, I am a librarian, by the way].
I was taught that heuristic searching was why browsing was valuable: that it referred to a situation when a person comes in searching for one thing but what they learn during the search clarifies the way in which they need to search in future (i.e. they might start searching for a slightly different thing.)
This is what humans are good at and getting a machine or system to do it is very difficult (but not necessarily impossible.) The solution re-defines the problem. it's how humans learn and progress.
Post a Comment